There is another developer doing the same thing and it is returning the app name from the mainifest file.
Any idea what is going on? I am using the Roku Ad Framework (RAF) and newest roku stick (device model 3600x). OS ver 7.5.0 (247.50E04099A247.50E04099A)
“rynop” wrote:
I have a screen graph app, not sure if that matters.
As long as it’s not in the Render thread, it should still work. I’m using it in a Scene Graph channel in Main() and in a Task node.
Maybe it’s a problem with your manifest file itself. Try starting with a completely blank, empty file and type in the manifest fields again (no cut n’ paste).
thanks. so strange. Fields in my manifest are definately working as things like splash_screen_fhd is working fine (and responds to adjustments in path values to new images)
I created my manifest from scratch, using emacs (I’m on MacOS). I still get roku:
Brightscript Debugger> print CreateObject("roAppInfo").gettitle()
roku
That’s very strange. Once more thing I’d try before declaring it a Roku bug, would be to create another channel that contains nothing but a manifest and a Main.brs, where Main() does nothing but print your appInfo title.
I tested on Roku Premiere and Roku Express and both worked / showed the correct app name from the manifest file.
What model and firmware are you on, in case it matters?
“Komag” wrote:
Maybe a difference between side-load and private channel?
No, i don’t think so. Looking forward to hear from @rynop what was the reason, my interest is piqued…
@belltown creating a clean project from eclipse indeed displayed the correct title value from manifest file.
The problem was, when I created the “problem” project in eclipse the 1st time, it created a 2nd manifest file under locale/en_US. This file has the “roku” string as the title…
“rynop” wrote:
The problem was, when I created the “problem” project in eclipse the 1st time, it created a 2nd manifest file under locale/en_US. This file has the “roku” string as the title…
i knew it was going to be something good! Thanks for sharing the puzzle solution
(PS. that would have made for a nasty job interview question)