An approval process for *private* channels?

Archived
1

This is probably a noob question, but I’m having trouble getting a clear picture of how this all works.

First, here’s what I’m after. Every week, I go to a friend’s house for a movie-night. He doesn’t have a DVD player, but he’s got a WD HD Live box, so I’m able to just rip some of my DVD’s to a USB drive and bring them over. Sometimes I forget to bring it and don’t realize it until I’ve driven over there, but, even when I remember… it’s kind of a drag to have to keep shuttling this USB drive back and forth.

What I’d like is to have my own, personal “Netflix” that we can stream from with a box at his house. I have access to my own web server with a routeable IP address, so getting to the server from his house’s network is not an issue. (As a bonus, I’d also like for my personal movie channel to show up as an icon just like the Netflix icon does).

Now, from what I’m reading, it’s possible (either with Roksbox or the Roku SDK) to get a Roku and then make a channel like this (I have the programming skill and access to any transcoding tools I might need to stream the video). But, I haven’t seen anything in any how-to’s about adding a channel to a Roku manually with just an IP address and port number. All of the how-to’s say that you have to submit the channel to Roku and then add the channel to your Roku box through their website.

That gives me the creeps. First, if the code ever got leaked somehow (or guessed, as some of the codes seem pretty short), I’m sure the MPAA would get all up in my business. But, my other worry is that, when I read the Pre-Publishing Checklist, it says “When you submit a channel for publication, it kicks off a process of testing and feedback to make sure your channel is ready for public consumption”. But I don’t want it to be for public consumption.

Also, I guess I could use Roksbox, but all of the how-to’s for that seem to tell you how to stream from a box on your local home LAN, and I want my box to be out on the big, bad, internet.

So, I’m a little confused. I heard Roku was supposedly “open”, and not the “walled garden” like the AppleTV. Isn’t there a way to manually add my own “just for my enjoyment” channels which, on my Rokus only, show up as legitimate channels alongside the other public ones?

2

Private channels aren’t reviewed, but they are uploaded to Roku’s servers, so they can be available to other boxes. Sharing the code would be up to you. If you use something obscure, it’s unlikely anyone will guess it.
You also have the option of enabling developer mode on your friend’s Roku, and sideloading the channel directly on the box, so it will only be available to that box.

All of that said, streaming high quality content the way you describe will require a really decent uplink from your network. While you and your friend may have decent download speeds, if the server streaming the content doesn’t also have a decent upload speed (probably at least 2mb), then it’s all a moot point, unless you’re ok with poorer quality video.

3

That’s all good news. Yeah, the webserver I run has plenty of bandwidth, so that’s not an issue.

Here’s the next question. Since I want my channel to look nice and slick (with thumbnails for all of the movies, possibly descriptions, etc.), can I do that with one of the current media-library offerings (like Plex, or Roksbox…) or am I better off just writing my own channel from scratch?

4

“TheEndless” wrote:
If you use something obscure, it’s unlikely anyone will guess it.
definitely use something obscure. i have a whole collection of private channel codes i stumbled across when trying to figure out the codes for published channels that are in the channel store. and i’m not the only one playing channel code guessing games. if you want it to stay private, a random string of numbers and letters is a good thing

5

“TheEndless” wrote:
Private channels aren’t reviewed

The exception to this is private channels that want to use the Roku purchase or subscription system to charge users a one-time or subscription fee to use the channel. They are subjected to pretty much the same process as Public channels that want to charge.

  • Joel
6

“RokuJoel” wrote:

“TheEndless” wrote:
Private channels aren’t reviewed

The exception to this is private channels that want to use the Roku purchase or subscription system to charge users a one-time or subscription fee to use the channel. They are subjected to pretty much the same process as Public channels that want to charge.

  • JoelI didn’t know that(private channels being able to charge via Roku billing) was an option :). Did that change when the Billing services program changed from being a “Premiere Developer account”, or has it been like that since developers were first able to charge via Roku? Just wondering. :slightly_smiling_face:
7

“gonzotek” wrote:

“RokuJoel” wrote:

“TheEndless” wrote:
Private channels aren’t reviewed
The exception to this is private channels that want to use the Roku purchase or subscription system to charge users a one-time or subscription fee to use the channel. They are subjected to pretty much the same process as Public channels that want to charge.

  • JoelI didn’t know that(private channels being able to charge via Roku billing) was an option :). Did that change when the Billing services program changed from being a “Premiere Developer account”, or has it been like that since developers were first able to charge via Roku? Just wondering. :slightly_smiling_face:
    Yes, when did it become possible to publish a private channel that used the Roku purchase/subscription system? That could be very useful for channels targeted at a much smaller audience than the general public…
8

The feature has been visible in private channel publishing for quite a while, at least since late 2011, but like me you probably scratched your head and thought it was a glitch on the website…

We don’t encourage people to use it and please, if you must, make sure your channel looks very professional and has high quality content that you have the rights to stream, or we’ll hit the reject button.

  • Joel
9

Actually, I’m beginning to wonder if there is an approval process for PUBLIC channels, considering some of the stuff that is becoming available in the channel store. On the rest of the internet, we’d call them “spam”, but on Roku, no.

10

“CacheFreeTV” wrote:
Actually, I’m beginning to wonder if there is an approval process for PUBLIC channels, considering some of the stuff that is becoming available in the channel store. On the rest of the internet, we’d call them “spam”, but on Roku, no.Eh, 90% of everything is crud. As the platform grows, it’s bound to happen. For comparison, the iOS app store is filled with how many junk apps? Roku just needs to get focused on helping expose the good stuff.

11

One persons crud is another’s hot fudge sundae…

Most of the recently released channels we’ve published, with maybe a few exceptions have pretty good graphic design and well encoded content. Some of the religious channels have what I would consider outstanding graphic design. (I guess that’s who is still hiring all the great artists these days, as it has been for thousands of years so it continues)

Some of what we recently published has outstanding general interest content - for example, Jonathan Birds Big Blue world, for example - truly stunning HD undersea footage.

UCTV has some great lectures on science, politics and social issues, MIT Open Courseware has some really fascinating courses on Robotics, Engineering, Mathematics and much more. (although the video resolution is fairly low-fidelity, the camera usually zooms in on the blackboard so you can read what is on it.). We’ve got some great musical-comedy channels like Kosher Metal and Metal Injection, and an incredible Multi-lingual education program, Innovative language that was release a few weeks ago. Hola NY streams great Latin music 24/7 and we probably are getting close to having a representative channel for almost every sub sect of every religion on earth.

“Surfacing” the higher quality channels and allowing some kind of filtering mechanism is something we are working on right now.

  • Joel
12

If all you are wanting to do is stream from home to a remote location, then check out Plex. http://www.plexapp.com

There are several Roku private channels developed for this, my favorite is installed with the code plexgrid

Enjoy

13

This feature has been present in private channel publishing since late 2011, and some may have initially considered it a website glitch.

We don’t endorse its use, but if you choose to, ensure your channel appears professional with high-quality, rights-cleared content, or we’ll decline it.